Christianity, Church of Christ, Churches of Christ, Change Agents, Change Movement, Restoration Movement, Church of Christ Brotherhood, Bible Studies, Religious Liberalism, Liberalism, Apostasy, Departures, Unity Forum, Christian JournalismChristianity, Church of Christ, Churches of Christ, Change Agents, Change Movement, Restoration Movement, Church of Christ Brotherhood, Bible Studies, Religious Liberalism, Liberalism, Apostasy, Departures, Unity Forum, Christian JournalismChristianity, Church of Christ, Churches of Christ, Change Agents, Change Movement, Restoration Movement, Church of Christ Brotherhood, Bible Studies, Religious Liberalism, Liberalism, Apostasy, Departures, Unity Forum, Christian JournalismChristianity, Church of Christ, Churches of Christ, Change Agents, Change Movement, Restoration Movement, Church of Christ Brotherhood, Bible Studies, Religious Liberalism, Liberalism, Apostasy, Departures, Unity Forum, Christian Journalism

THE LAW OF CHRIST

Inspired writers refer to the  New Testament as "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" (Rom. 8:2); "the perfect law, the law of liberty" (Jas. 1:23) and a "law of faith" (Rom. 3:27). This being the case, how say the change agents among us that we are not under a law of God?  They love to say that we should not view the Bible as divine law. Are they so ignorant of the book they claim to teach?  Do they not believe what the Scripture says of itself?  Do they think they know more about God's Book than the Holy Spirit who gave it? Could it be that in order to sell their agenda to a Bible-believing, Bible oriented people, they must first convince them that the Scripture is not law, therefore it will be no great thing if its words are ignored?

If the Bible is not divine law, then no man is a sinner. For "where there is no law, neither is there transgression" (Rom. 4:15).  If we have no divine law, how can some be called "lawless" in their conduct? (II Thess. 2:7; I Tim. 1:9).  If the Scripture is not law, how could some men in the church be desirous of teaching "the law?" (I Tim. 1:7). If there is no law in Christ, we would have no knowledge of sin, or of right and wrong, "for through the law cometh the knowledge of sin" (Rom. 3:20).  If the New Covenant is not God's law, then no man need worry about being judged by it in the last day (John 12:48). If it is not law, then we can do anything we desire in the name of religion and not worry about having to give account unto God (II Cor. 5:10; Rev. 20:12).  If the Scripture is not law, then James and Paul were mistaken in calling it that.  If that is so, how can we have confidence in other things they said?  That would mean the New Covenant is not reliable and free from error, would it not? If God had wanted to tell us that his written word is His law to guide and govern us in maters of faith, practice and worship, what do our champions of change feel He should have said, beyond what he has said, to make it clear?

It is true that we are not under the Law of Moses (Heb. 8:6-13; Rom. 7:4). It is true that we are saved by God's grace rather than by law-keeping (Eph. 2:8-9).  It is a fact that our response to God must be one of faith rather than an attempt to earn salvation by works of law (Rom. 3:21-22).  But it is a flagrant error to teach men that God's Word should not be viewed as law.  This lesson our change agents need to take heed to. 

JHW

    Previous Study

    Index

    Next Study

     

     

     

    Contact the editor      

    Recommend this site

    Free On-line Subscription

     

     

     

     

    Enter Email Address

    Subscribe

    Unsubscribe

     

    February 2005 Issue

     

    Contact CTN Magazine

     

     

     

     

    CHRISTIANITY:

    Then & Now on-line

    All rights reserved

    Copyright © 2002

     

     

     

     

    This site built for

    800 x 600 display